6. PEASANTS
& FARMERS
THE TIME OF OPEN FIELDS AND COMMONS
(i) Before late
eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries in large part of England the
countryside was open. It was not partitioned into enclosed lands privately
owned by landlords. Peasants cultivated on strips of land, around the village
they lived in. each villager was allocated a number of strips to cultivate.
Usually, these strips were of varying quality and often located in different
places, to ensure that everyone had a mix of good and bad land. Beyond these
strips of cultivation lay the common land. All villagers had access to the commons.
Here they pastured their cows and grazed their sheep, collected fuel wood for
fire and berries and fruit for food. They fished in the rivers and ponds, and
hunted rabbit in common forests. For the poor, the common land was essential
for survival. It supplemented their meagre income, substantiated their cattle,
and helped them tide over bad times when crops failed.
(ii) From about the
sixteenth century, when the price of wool went up in the world market, rich
farmers wanted to expand wool production to earn profits. They were eager to
improve their sheep breeds and ensure good feed for them. They were keen on
controlling large areas of land in compact blocks to allow improved breeding.
So they beggar dividing and enclosing common land and building hedges around
their holdings to separate their property from that of others. They drove out villagers,
who had small cottages on the commons, and they prevented the poor from
entering the enclosed fields. Between 1750 and 1850, 6 million acres of land was
enclosed. The British Parliament passed 4,000 Acts legalising these enclosures.
NEW DEMANDS FOR GRAIN
(i) English
population between 1750 and 1900, multiplied over four times, mounting from 7
million in 1750 to 21 million in 1850 and 30 million in 1900. This meant an
increased demand for food grains to feed the population. Moreover, Britain at
this was industrializing. More and more people began to live and work in urban
areas. Men from rule areas migrated to towns in search of jobs. To survive they
had to buy food grains in the market. As the urban population grew, the market
for food grains expanded, and when demand increased rapidly, food grain prices
rose.
(ii) By the end of
the eighteenth century, France was at war with England. Prices of food grains
in England sky rocketed, encouraging landowners to enclose lands and enlarge
the area under grain cultivation.
THE AGE OF ENCLOSURES
(i) In the nineteenth
century, grain production grew as quickly as population. Even though the
population increased rapidly, in 1868 England was producing about 80 per cent
of the food it consumed.
(ii) This increase
in food-grain production was made possible by bringing new lands under
cultivation.
Landlords
sliced up pasturelands, carved up open fields, cut up forest commons, took over
marshes, and turned larger and larger areas into agricultural fields.
Importance of turnip and clover for farmers:
In about the
1660s farmers in many parts of England began growing turnip and clover these
crops improved the soil and made it more fertile. Turnip was a good fodder crop
relished by cattle. These crops became part of the cropping system. These crops
had the capacity to increase the nitrogen content of the soil. Nitrogen was important
for crop growth. Cultivation of the same soil over a few years depleted the
nitrogen in the soil and reduced its fertility. By restoring nitrogen, turnip
and clover made the soil fertile once again. Enclosures were now seen as
necessary to make long-tern investments on land and plan crop rotations to improve
the soil. Enclosures also allowed the richer landowners to expand the land
under their control and produce more for the market.
THE CONDITIONS THE POOR
When fences
came up, the enclosed land became the exclusive property of one landowner. The
poor could no longer collect their firewood from the forests, or graze their
cattle on the commons. They could no longer collect apples and berries, or hunt
small animals for meat. Nor could they gather the stalks that lay on the fields
after the crops were cut. Everything belonged to the landlords; everything had
a price which the poor could not afford to pay. In places where enclosure
happened – the poor were displaced from the land. They found their customary rights
gradually disappearing. Deprived of their rights and driven off the land, they
tramped in search of work.
From the
Midlands, they moved to the southern counties of England. But nowhere could the
poor find secure jobs. Labourers were being paid wages and employed only during
harvest time. As landowners triad to increase their profits, they cut the
amount they had to spend on their workmen. Work became insecure, employment uncertain,
income unstable. For a very large part of the year the poor had no work.
THE INTRODUCTION OF THRESHING MACHINES
(i) During the
Napoleonic Wars prices of food grains were high and farmers expanded production
vigorously.
Fearing a
shortage of labour, they began buying the new threshing machines that had come
into the market.
(ii) After the
Napoleonic Wars had ended, thousands of soldiers returned to villages. They
needed alternative job to survive. But this was a time when grain from Europe began
flowing into England; prices declined, and as Agricultural Depression set in.
Anxious, landowners, tried to cut wages and the number of workmen they employed.
(iii) The Captain
Swing riots spread in the countryside at this time. For the poor the threshing
machines had become a sign of bad times.
BREAD BASET AND DUST BOWL
(i) At the end of
the eighteenth century, settled agriculture had not developed on any extensive
scale in the USA.
Forests covered
over 800 million acres and grasslands 600 million acres.
(ii) Most of the
landscape was not under the control of white Americans. Till the 1780s, white
American settlements were confined to a small narrow strip of coastal land in
the east . Native American groups in the country were nomadic, some were
settled. Many of them lived only by hunting, gathering and fishing; others cultivated
com, beans, tobacco and pumpkin.
(iii) By the early
twentieth century, this landscape had transformed radically. White Americans had
moved westward and established control up to the west cost, displacing local
tribes and carving out the entire landscape into different agricultural belts.
The USA had come to ordinate the world market in agricultural produce.
THE WESTWARD MOVE AND WHEAT CULTIVATION
(i) After the
American War of independence from 1775 to 1783 and the formation of the United
States of America, the white Americans began to move westward. By the time
Thomas Jefferson became President of the USA in 1800, over 700,000 white
settlers had moved on to the Appalachian plateau through the passes. Seen from the
east coast, America seemed to be a land of promise. Its wilderness could be
trued into cultivated fields. Forest timber could be cut for export, animal
hunted for skin, mountains mined for gold and animals.
(ii) In the decades
after 1800 the US government comment committed itself to a policy of driving
the American Indians westward, first beyond the river Mississippi, and then
further west. As the Indians retreated, the settler’s poured in. they settled
on the Appalachian plateau by the first decade of the eighteenth century, and
then moved into the Mississippi valley between 1820 and 1850. Then they cleared
larger areas, and erected fences around the fields. They ploughed the land and
sowed corn and wheat. When the soil became impoverished and exhausted in one
place, the migrants would move further west, to explore new lands and raise a
new crop. It was, however, only after the 1860s that settlers swept into the
Great Plains across the River Mississippi.
THE WHEAT FARMERS
(i) From the late
nineteenth century there was a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the
USA. The rising urban population, export market was becoming ever bigger and
rise in what prices, encouraged farmers to produce wheat. The spread of the
railways made it easy to transport the grain from the wheat growing regions to the
eastern coast for export. By the twentieth century the demand became even
higher, and during the First
World War the world market boomed.
(ii) In 1910, about
45 million acres of land in the USA was under wheat. Nine years later, the area
had expanded to 74 million acres, an increase of about 65 per cent. In many
cases, big farmers – the wheat barons – controlled as much as 2,000 to 3,000
acres of land individually.
THE COMING OF NEW TECNNOLOGY
(i) This dramatic
expansion was made possible by new technology. Through the nineteenth century,
as the settlers moved into new habitats and lands, they modified their
implements to meet their requirements.
(ii) The prairie was
covered with a thick mat of grass with tough roots. To break th sod and turn
the soil over, a variety of new ploughs were devised locally. By early
twentieth century, farmers in the Great Plains were breaking the ground with
tractors and disk ploughs, clearing vast stretches for wheat cultivation.
In 1831, Cyrus
McCormick invented the first mechanical reaper. By the early twentieth century,
most farmers were using combined harvesters to cut grain. With one of these
machines, 5oo acres of wheat could be harvested in two weeks.
(iii) For the big
farmers of the Great Plains these machines had many attractions. The price of
wheat was high and the demand seemed limitless.
(v) With power
driven machinery, four men could plough, seed and harvest 2,000 to 4,000 acres
of wheat in a season.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE POOR?
For the poorer
farmers, machines brought misery. They borrowed money on loan to buy machines
but found it difficult to pay back their debts. Many of them deserted their
farmers and looked for jobs elsewhere. Mechanization reduced the need for labour.
After 1920’s most farmers traced troubles. Production had expanded so rapidly
during the war and post-war years that there was a large surplus. Unsold stocks
piled up, storehouses overflowed with grain, and vast amounts of corn and wheat
were turned into animal feed. Wheat prices fell and export markets collapsed.
This created the grounds for the Great Agrarian Depressions of the 1930s that
ruined wheat farmers everywhere.
DUST BOWL
In the 1930s,
terrifying dust storms began to blow over the southern plains. Black blizzards
rolled in, very often 7,000 to 8,000 feet high, rising like monstrous waves of
muddy water. As the skies darkened, and the dust swept in, people were blinded
and choked. Cattle were suffocated to death; their lungs caked whit dust and
mud. Sand buried fences, covered fields, and coated the surfaces of rivers till
the fish died. Dead bodies of birds and animals were strewing all over the
landscape. Tractors and machines that had ploughed the earth and harvested the wheat
in the 1920s were now clogged with dust, damaged beyond repair. They came
because the early 1930s were years of persistent drought. Ordinary dust storms
became black blizzards only because the entire landscape had been ploughed
over, stripped of all grass that held it together. When wheat cultivation had
expanded dramatically in the early twentieth century, zealous farmers had
recklessly uprooted all vegetation, and tractors had expanded dramatically in
the early twenties century, zealous farmers had recklessly uprooted all
vegetation, and tractors had turned the soil over, and broken the sod into
dust. The whole region had become a dust bowl.
THE INDIAN FARMER AND OPIUM PRODUCTION
Over the period
of colonial rule, the rural landscape was radically transformed. As cultivation
expanded, the area under frosts and pastures declined. In the colonial period,
rural India also came to produce a range of crops for the world market. In the early
nineteenth century, indigo and opium were two of the major commercial crops. By
the end of the century, peasants were producing sugarcane, cotton, jute, wheat
and several other crops for export.
A TASTE FOR TEA: THE TRADE WITH CHINA
(i) In the
eighteenth century, the English East India Company was buying tea and silk from
China for sale in
England .As tea
became a popular English drink, the trade became more and more important in
fact the profits of the East India Company came to depend on the tea trade.
(ii) England at
this time produces nothing that could be easily sold in China. In such a
situation, how could
Western
merchants finance the tea trade? They could buy tea only by paying in silver coins
or bullion. This meant an outflow of treasure from England, a prospect that
created widespread anxiety. Merchants therefore looked for ways to stop this
loss of sliver. They searched for a commodity they could sell in China, something
they could persuade the Chinese t6o buy. Opium was such a commodity.
(iii) The
Chinese were aware of the dangers of opium addiction, and the Emperor had
forbidden its production and sale except for medicinal purposes. But Western
merchants in the mid-eighteenth century began an illegal trade in opium.
(iv) While the
English cultivated a taste for Chinese tea, the Chinese became addicted to
opium. People of all classes took to the drug-shopkeepers and peddlers,
officials and army men, aristocrats and paupers:
As China became
a country of opium addicts, British trade in tea flourished. The returns from
opium sale financed the tea purchases in China.
THE OPIUM CAM FROM
When the
British conquered Bengal, they, made a determined effort to produces opium in
the lands under their control. Before 1767, no more then 500 chests were being
exported from India. A hundred years later, in 1870, the government was
exporting about 50,000 chests annually.
FARMERS WERE UNWILLING TO TURN THEIR FIELDS OVER T POPPY
First the crop
had to be grown on the best land, on fields that near villages and well
matured. Second, many cultivators owned no land. To cultivate, they had to pay
rent and lease land landlords. Third, the cultivation of opium was a difficult
process. Finally, the price the government paid to the cultivators for the
opium they produced was very low.
UNWILLING WATERS WERE MADE OP PRODUCE OPIUM
(i) In the
rural areas of Bengal and Bihar, there were large numbers of poor peasants.
From the 1780s such peasants found their village headmen (mabato) giving them
money advances to produce opium.
(ii) By taking
the loan, the cultivator was forced to grow opium on a specified area of land
hand over the produce to the agents once the crop had been harvested.
(iii) The
problem could have been partly solved by increasing the price of opium. The prices
given to the peasants were so low that by the early eighteenth century angry
peasants began agitating for higher prices and refused to take advances.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBut still these are helpful this is the main content book also has some unnessary one
ReplyDeleteThank u soo much! This helped a lot!
ReplyDeletethis is not a summary just stop this website
ReplyDeletethis is not valid this is time pass stop this
ReplyDeleteAnonymous who commented on 29 December 2016 get a life bro this is very helpful
ReplyDeleteThis is very good and amazing website to make us learn social science without taking much effort.
ReplyDeleteVery useful
ReplyDeleteIts very useful for me... And I like it
ReplyDeleteIt's good and helps easily understanding.
ReplyDeleteToo big to be called a summary
ReplyDelete