Saturday, January 3, 2015

History Solution Class 9 Chapter 7 (Summary) HISTORY & SPORTS THE SPORTS OF CRICKET

7. HISTORY & SPORTS: THE SPORTS OF CRICKET
THE IMPORTANCE OF CRICKET IN THE MODERN TIMES
Cricket as a sport has one of the largest followings in the world. Anyone who knows to speak the word ‘Cricket’ can assume himself to be an expert in the game.
(i) It is the most widely played game, especially in the former Commonwealth countries. Its range includes from Gully- Mohalla cricket to international test matches.
(ii) It is the biggest source of entertainment, not only for thousands and thousands of the spectators at the playing grounds but also other millions who watch a ball-by-ball progress on TV sets, etc.
(iii) Every single ball generates passion.
(iv) It is one way in which people compete with each other, stay fit and express their social loyalties.
(v) Cricket matches are organized to establish friendship between Nations; cricketers are seen as ambassadors of the country.
(vi) Cricket has come to represent the unity of the country.
(vii) Cricket has emerged as the biggest commercial venture; it is a whole big industry which generates jobs and income on a large scale.

(a) Invention of Cricket and its spread:
(i) Cricket was invented in Southeastern England in the 19th century. The Britishers took the game to all those places where they went, i.e., to their colonies in Asia and Africa. This is now cricket became a popular game in the former colonies of Great Britain.
(ii) After these colonies gained independence from their former rulers, they were organized in want came to be known as the Commonwealth. The game of cricket, therefore, is limited to the members of the Commonwealth. Important cricket playing countries are India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Australia, New Zealand, England, West Indies, Zimbabwe, South Africa and Kenya.

(c) Cricket represent’s:
Cricket had been invented in England; it became intimately linked to the culture of the 19th century Victorian society. The game was expected to represent all that the Englishmen were supposed to value and respect, i.e.,
(i) Fair play,
(ii) Discipline, and
(iii) Gentlemanliness.
It was in this spirit that game was played till recent times, before commercialization took over the game. With commercialization, money has become the ruling deity of game.

THE PECULIARITIEST CRICKET
Modern cricket has different varieties; among these the two important ones are:
(i) Test matches, and
(ii) one-day matches. Test matches are played over a longer period often (five days presently), whereas a one day match is restricted to a limited of over that each side is to bowl to other side. Originally, cricket developed in the form of test matches.

 (a) There were certain features of this game that made it different then other games:
(i) Test matches were open-ended games. There was no time defined. they would go on till the result was decided (presently a test match is a five day game, if no result is achieved in five days it is declared a drawn game). There is no other game with such a larger time span.
(ii) In cricket, the length of the pitch is specified-22 yard-but the size or shape of the ground is not defined. This is not so any other game.
(iii) In cricket, all important tools are made of natural materials, unlike golf and tennis where man-made materials are used.
(iv) In cricket, a player is a member of a team. He plays for the team and not for individual laurels.

(b)Peculiarities of cricket are shaped by its historical beginnings as a village game:
One, cricket’s rules were made before the industrial Revolution. The rhythms of village life were slower. A match could go on and on till was decided. Games that were codified after the Industrial Revolution were strictly time limited to fit the routines of industrial city life.
Two, cricket was originally played on common lands in the countryside. The size of the common lands varied from village, and region to region. Therefore, it was left open to decide the boundaries of the ground in the area in which the match was being played.
There, unlike other games cricket’s most important tools are all made of natural, pre-industrial materials. The bat is made of wood as are the stumps and the bails. The ball is made with leather twine and cork.
In the matter of protective equipment has been influenced by technological change. The invention of vulcanized rubber led to the introduction of pads in 1848. Protective gloves were introduced soon thereafter. Helmets made out of metal and synthetic lightweight materials became an important part of protective equipment. But technological change did not materially alter the essence of the basic tools of the game, viz.,
(i) Bat,
(ii) Stumps,
(iii) Bails, and
(iv) Ball. These continue to be made out of natural materials.
LAWS OF CRICKET
(a) The first written ‘Laws of Cricket’:
The first written ‘Laws of Cricket’ were drawn up in 1744. They stated, the principals shall choose from amongst the gentlemen present two umpires who shall absolutely decide all disputes. The stumps must be 22 inches high and the bail across them six inches. The ball must be between 5 and 6 ounces, and the two sets of stumps 22 yards apart. There were no limits on the shape or size of the bat.
(b) Major changes that took amine to the game of cricket during the 1760s and 1770s:
During the 1760s and 1770s many changes took place in the game of cricket. it became common to pitch the ball through the air, rather than roll it along the ground . This change gave bowlers the options of length, deception through the air, plus increased pace. It also opened new possibilities for spin and swing. In responses, batsmen had to master timing and shot selection. One immediate result was the replacement of the curved bat with the straight one. All of this raised the premium on skill and reduced the influence of rough ground brute force.
 (ii) In 1774, the first leg-before law was published.
(iii) A third stump became common.
(iv) By 1780, three days had become the length of a major match, and this year also saw the creation of the first six seam cricket ball.
(c) Important changes that occurred in the game of cricket during the 19 th century:
During the 19th century the important changes that occurred in the game of cricket can be briefly stated as follows:
(i) The rule about wide ball was applied.
(ii) The exact circumference of the ball was specified.
(iii) Protective equipment like pads and gloves became available.
(iv) Boundaries were introduced; earlier all runs were scored by running between the stumps. over am bowling became legal.
CRICKET AND VICTORIAN ENGLAND
The organization of cricket in England reflected the nature of English society.
The players were divided into two groups: (A) Professionals and (B) Amateurs.
(i) Those persons who played cricket for a living were called professionals.
The wages of professionals were paid by patronage or subscription or gate money. The game was seasonal and did not offer employment the year round.
Most professionals worked as miners or, in other forms of working class employment in winter, the off-season.
(ii) The rich who could afford to play for pleasure were called amateurs and the poor who played it for a living were called professionals.
(a) The rich were amateurs for two reasons:
One, they considered sport a kind of leisure. To play for the pleasure of playing and not for money was an aristocratic value. Two, there was not enough money in the game for the rich to be interested.
(i) The social superiority of amateurs was built the customs of cricket. Amateurs were called Gentlemen while professionals had to be content with being described as Players.
(ii) They entered the ground from different entrances.
(iii) Amateurs tended to be batsmen, leaving the energetic, hardworking aspects of the game, like fast bowling, to the professionals. That is partly why the rules of the game always give the benefit of the doubt to the batsman.
(b) Cricket a batsman’s game:
Cricket is a batsman’s game because its rules were made to favour ‘Gentlemen’, who did most of the batting. The social superiority of the amateur was also the captain of a cricket team was traditionally a batsman: not because batsmen were naturally better captains but because they were generally Gentlemen. Captains of teams, whether club teams or national sides, were always amateurs. It was not till the 1930s that the English Test team was led by a professional, the Yorkshire batsman, Len Hutton.
(c) “Battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton”:
In actual fact the Napoleonic wars were won because of the economic contribution of the iron works of Scotland and Wales, the mills of Lancashire and the financial houses of the City of London. it was the English lead in trade and industry that made Britain the world’s greatest power, but it suited the English ruling class to believe that it was the superior character of its young men, built in boarding schools , like Eton, playing gentlemanly games like cricket , that tipped the balance.
THE SPREAD OF CRICKET
(i) In colonies, cricket was established as a popular sport either by white settlers (as in South Africa, Zimbabwe, Australia, New Zealand, the West Indies and Kenya) or by local elites who wanted to copy the habits of their colonial masters, as in India.
(ii) While British imperial officials brought the game to the colonies, they made little effort to spread the game, especially in colonial territories.
(iii) Playing cricket became a sign of superior social and racial status, and the Afro-Caribbean population was discouraged from participating in organised club cricket, which remained dominated by white plantation owners and their servants.
(iv) The first non-white club in the West Indies was established towards the end of the nineteenth century, and even in this case its members were light-skinned mulattos.
(v) Despite the exclusiveness of the cricket elite in the Wheat Indies, the game became hugely popular in the Caribbean.
(vi) At the time of their independence many of the political leaders of Caribbean countries like Forbes Burnham and Eric Williams saw in the game a chance for salt-respect and international standing.
(vii) When the West Indies won its first Test series against England in 1950s , it was celebrated as a national achievement , as a way of demonstrating that West Indians were the equals of white Englishmen.
(viii) The first time a black pack led the West Indies Test team was in 1960 when Frank Worrell was named captain.
(ix) Through the early history of Indian first class cricket, teams were not organized on geographical principles and it was not till 1932 that a national tern was given the right to represent India in a Test match.
(a) Cricket, Race and Religion:
(i) Cricket in colonial India was organised on the principle of race and religion. The first record we have of cricket being played in India is from 1721. The first Indian club, the Calcutta Cricket Club was established in 1792. Through the eighteenth century cricket in India was almost wholly a sport played by British military men and civil servants in all-white clubs and gymkhanas. Indians were considered to have no talent for the game and certainly not meant to play it. But they did.
(ii) The origins of India cricket, that is, cricket played by Indian are to be found in Bombay and the first Indian community to start playing the game was the small community of Zoroastrians, the Parsis .the Parsis founded the first Indian cricket club , the Oriental Cricket Club in Bombay in 1848. The white cricket elite in India offered no help to the enthusiastic Parsis. In fact, there was a quarrel between the Bombay Gymkhana, a white-only club, and Paris cricketers over the use of a public park. When it became clear that the colonial authorities were prejudiced in favour of their white compatriots, the Parsis built own gymkhana to play cricket in. a Parsis team beat the Bombay Gymkhana at cricket in 1889, just four years after the foundation of the Indian National Congress in 1885.
(iii) By the 1890s, Hindus and Muslims were buys gathering funds and support for a Hindu Gymkhana and an Islam Gymkhana. In the late nineteenth century, many Indian institutions and movements were organised around the idea of religious community because the colonial state encouraged these division and was quick to recognise communal institutions. Applications that used the communal categories favoured by the colonial state were likely to be approved.
(iv) This history of gymkhana cricket led to first-class cricket being organised on communal and racial lines. The tournament was initially called Quadrangular, because it was played by four teams: the Europeans, the Parsis, the Hindu and the Muslims. It later became the Pent angular when a fifth team was added, namely, the Rest, which comprised all the communities left over, such as the Indian Christians.
 (v) By the late 1930s and early 1940s, journalists, cricketers and political leaders had begun to criticize the racial and communal foundations of the Pent angular torment. They condemned the Pent angular as a communally divisive competition that was out of place in a time when nationalists were trying to unite India’s diverse population. a rive first-class tournament on regional lines , the National Cricket Championship (later named the Ranji Trophy), was established but not until independence did it properly replace the Pent angular . Pent angular was a colonial toumament and it died with the Raj.
(b)Mahatma Gandhi’s views on cricket.
Mahatma Gandhi believed that sport was essential for creating a balance between the body and the mind.
However, he often emphasized that games like cricket and hockey were imported into India by the British and were replacing traditional games. Suck games as cricket, hockey, football and tennis were for the privileged, he believed. They showed a colonial mindset and were a less active education then the simple exercise of those who worked on the land.
THE MODERN TRANSFORMATION
(i) Modern cricket is dominated by Tests and one day internationals, played between national teams.
(ii) The players Indian fans remember from the ear of the Pent angular and the quadrangular are those who were fortunate enough to play Test cricket.
(iii) C.K.Nayudu, an outstanding Indian batsman of his time, lives on in the popular imagination when some of his great contemporaries like Palwanker Vithal and Palwanker Baloo have forgotten because his career lasted long enough for him to play Test cricket for India while theirs did not.
(iv) Nayudu has past his cricketing prime when he played for India in its first Test matches against England starting in 1932; his place in India’s cricket history is assured because he was the country’s first Test captain.
(v) Indica entered the world of Test cricket in 1932s,a decade and a half before it became an independent nation. This was possible because Test cricket from its origins 1877 was organised as a contest between different parts of the British empire, not sovereign nations.
(vi) He first Test was played between England and Australia when Australia was still a white settler colony, not even a self-governing dominion.
(a) The name of ICC was changed from the Imperial Cricket Conference to the International Cricket
Conference:
The imperial Cricket Conference was responsible for the regulation of the game of cricket throughout the world. it was dominated by two nations , England and Australia. They had the veto rights.
With the disappearance of the British Empire, the organization of world cricket was also undergoing a change.




Two major changes suggestive of decolonization and de imperialism were:
(i) The name of Imperial Cricket Conference was changed into the international Cricket Conference.
(ii) The veto right were abolished. Equal membership was introduced.
The significance of the shift of the ICC headquarters from London to Dubai.
The shift the ICC headquarters from London to Dubai signified that the balance of power in cricket was shifting from ex-colonial power and white men to South Asis, who have come to dominate the world cricket.

(b) The impact of decolonization on cricket:
Cricket had developed as a game in colonial countries. It spread to those countries where the colonial rulers went. In course of time, colonies began to produce better played of cricket then were available with the colonial power themselves. But the colonial powers could successfully curb the growth of such talent. With decolonization, all such restriction s on the growth of cricket stood removed. Some significant

changes began to take place in the organization of cricket:
(i) The name of the Imperial Cricket Conference was changed into the International Cricket Conference.
(ii) The headquarters of the ICC were shifted from London to Dubai.
 (iii) Veto right of England and Australia in ICC were removed. All members got equal rights.
(iv) England had to boycott South Africa who did not permit non-white players to represent their country.
(v) It came to be accepted that the laws of cricket could not continue to be framed for British or Australian conditions of play. The techniques of ‘doosra’ and ‘reverse swing’ evolved by the Asian bowlers to suit their conditions came to be accepted and endorsed.

COMMERUES MEDIA AND CRICKET TODY
Advances in technology had a dramatic effect on the game of cricket. On-field, the concept of ‘Third Umpire’ was put in practice. a number of major decisions on field could be referred to him as he had the benefit of replays of every event from all possible angles. Stumps carried cameras; umpires could talk direct to the ground staff and others from their radios. Score – boards became more functional and informative. Off-field, organization of matches became much more convenient with easy free flow required information. With the advent of television, cricket became a marketable game which could generate huge revenues.
(i) Cricket boards became rich by selling television rights to television companies.
(ii) Television channels made money by selling television spots to companies who were happy to pay large sums of money to air commercial for their products to cricket’s captive television audience.
(iii) Continuous television coverage made cricketers celebrities who, besides being paid better by their cricket boards, now made even large sums of money by making commercials for a wide range of products , from tyres to colas, on television.
(iv) Television coverage expanded the audience for the game by beaming cricket into small towns and villages.
(v) It also broadened cricket’s social base. Children who had never previously had the chance to watch international cricket because they lived outside the big cities, where top-level cricket was played, could now watch and learn by imitating their heroes.
(vi) The technology of satellite television and the world wide reach of multinational television companies created a global market for cricket.

Contribution of Kerry Packer in development of cricket
Kerry Packer was an Australian television tycoon. He saw the money-making potential of cricket as a television sport. He introduced ‘World Series Cricket’. He signed up fifty-one of the world’s leading cricketers against the wishes of the national cricket boards and for about two years staged unofficial Tests One-Day internationals. The innovations he introduced during this time to make cricket more attractive to television audiences endured and changed the nature of the game.
Coloured dress, protective helmets, filed restrictions, cricket under lights, became a standers part of the post- Packer game. Crucially, Packer drove home the lesson that cricket was a marketable game, which could generate huge revenues.
(a) The centre of gravity in cricket has shifted away from the old:
(i) A more impotent sign that the centre of gravity in cricket has shifted away from the old, Anglo-Australian axis is that innovations in cricket technique in recent years have mainly come from the proactive of sub continental terns in countries like India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
(ii) Pakistan has pioneered two great advances in bowling: the doosra and the; rivers swing’.
(iii) Initially, both innovations were greeted with great suspicion by countries like Britain and Australia which saw them as an underhanded, illegal bending of the laws of cricket.
(iv) In time, it came to be accepted that the laws of cricket could not continue to be framed for British or
Australian conditions of play, and they became part of the technique of ll bowlers, everywhere in the world.

(v) Today, the global marketplace has made Indian players the best-paid, most famous cricketers in the game, men for whom the world is a stage.

Labels:

History Solution Class 9 Chapter 6 (Summary) Peasants and Farmers

6. PEASANTS & FARMERS
THE TIME OF OPEN FIELDS AND COMMONS
(i) Before late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries in large part of England the countryside was open. It was not partitioned into enclosed lands privately owned by landlords. Peasants cultivated on strips of land, around the village they lived in. each villager was allocated a number of strips to cultivate. Usually, these strips were of varying quality and often located in different places, to ensure that everyone had a mix of good and bad land. Beyond these strips of cultivation lay the common land. All villagers had access to the commons. Here they pastured their cows and grazed their sheep, collected fuel wood for fire and berries and fruit for food. They fished in the rivers and ponds, and hunted rabbit in common forests. For the poor, the common land was essential for survival. It supplemented their meagre income, substantiated their cattle, and helped them tide over bad times when crops failed.
(ii) From about the sixteenth century, when the price of wool went up in the world market, rich farmers wanted to expand wool production to earn profits. They were eager to improve their sheep breeds and ensure good feed for them. They were keen on controlling large areas of land in compact blocks to allow improved breeding. So they beggar dividing and enclosing common land and building hedges around their holdings to separate their property from that of others. They drove out villagers, who had small cottages on the commons, and they prevented the poor from entering the enclosed fields. Between 1750 and 1850, 6 million acres of land was enclosed. The British Parliament passed 4,000 Acts legalising these enclosures.

NEW DEMANDS FOR GRAIN
(i) English population between 1750 and 1900, multiplied over four times, mounting from 7 million in 1750 to 21 million in 1850 and 30 million in 1900. This meant an increased demand for food grains to feed the population. Moreover, Britain at this was industrializing. More and more people began to live and work in urban areas. Men from rule areas migrated to towns in search of jobs. To survive they had to buy food grains in the market. As the urban population grew, the market for food grains expanded, and when demand increased rapidly, food grain prices rose.
(ii) By the end of the eighteenth century, France was at war with England. Prices of food grains in England sky rocketed, encouraging landowners to enclose lands and enlarge the area under grain cultivation.

THE AGE OF ENCLOSURES
(i) In the nineteenth century, grain production grew as quickly as population. Even though the population increased rapidly, in 1868 England was producing about 80 per cent of the food it consumed.
(ii) This increase in food-grain production was made possible by bringing new lands under cultivation.
Landlords sliced up pasturelands, carved up open fields, cut up forest commons, took over marshes, and turned larger and larger areas into agricultural fields.

Importance of turnip and clover for farmers:
In about the 1660s farmers in many parts of England began growing turnip and clover these crops improved the soil and made it more fertile. Turnip was a good fodder crop relished by cattle. These crops became part of the cropping system. These crops had the capacity to increase the nitrogen content of the soil. Nitrogen was important for crop growth. Cultivation of the same soil over a few years depleted the nitrogen in the soil and reduced its fertility. By restoring nitrogen, turnip and clover made the soil fertile once again. Enclosures were now seen as necessary to make long-tern investments on land and plan crop rotations to improve the soil. Enclosures also allowed the richer landowners to expand the land under their control and produce more for the market.

THE CONDITIONS THE POOR
When fences came up, the enclosed land became the exclusive property of one landowner. The poor could no longer collect their firewood from the forests, or graze their cattle on the commons. They could no longer collect apples and berries, or hunt small animals for meat. Nor could they gather the stalks that lay on the fields after the crops were cut. Everything belonged to the landlords; everything had a price which the poor could not afford to pay. In places where enclosure happened – the poor were displaced from the land. They found their customary rights gradually disappearing. Deprived of their rights and driven off the land, they tramped in search of work.
From the Midlands, they moved to the southern counties of England. But nowhere could the poor find secure jobs. Labourers were being paid wages and employed only during harvest time. As landowners triad to increase their profits, they cut the amount they had to spend on their workmen. Work became insecure, employment uncertain, income unstable. For a very large part of the year the poor had no work.

THE INTRODUCTION OF THRESHING MACHINES
(i) During the Napoleonic Wars prices of food grains were high and farmers expanded production vigorously.
Fearing a shortage of labour, they began buying the new threshing machines that had come into the market.
(ii) After the Napoleonic Wars had ended, thousands of soldiers returned to villages. They needed alternative job to survive. But this was a time when grain from Europe began flowing into England; prices declined, and as Agricultural Depression set in. Anxious, landowners, tried to cut wages and the number of workmen they employed.
(iii) The Captain Swing riots spread in the countryside at this time. For the poor the threshing machines had become a sign of bad times.

BREAD BASET AND DUST BOWL
(i) At the end of the eighteenth century, settled agriculture had not developed on any extensive scale in the USA.
Forests covered over 800 million acres and grasslands 600 million acres.
(ii) Most of the landscape was not under the control of white Americans. Till the 1780s, white American settlements were confined to a small narrow strip of coastal land in the east . Native American groups in the country were nomadic, some were settled. Many of them lived only by hunting, gathering and fishing; others cultivated com, beans, tobacco and pumpkin.
(iii) By the early twentieth century, this landscape had transformed radically. White Americans had moved westward and established control up to the west cost, displacing local tribes and carving out the entire landscape into different agricultural belts. The USA had come to ordinate the world market in agricultural produce.

THE WESTWARD MOVE AND WHEAT CULTIVATION
(i) After the American War of independence from 1775 to 1783 and the formation of the United States of America, the white Americans began to move westward. By the time Thomas Jefferson became President of the USA in 1800, over 700,000 white settlers had moved on to the Appalachian plateau through the passes. Seen from the east coast, America seemed to be a land of promise. Its wilderness could be trued into cultivated fields. Forest timber could be cut for export, animal hunted for skin, mountains mined for gold and animals.
(ii) In the decades after 1800 the US government comment committed itself to a policy of driving the American Indians westward, first beyond the river Mississippi, and then further west. As the Indians retreated, the settler’s poured in. they settled on the Appalachian plateau by the first decade of the eighteenth century, and then moved into the Mississippi valley between 1820 and 1850. Then they cleared larger areas, and erected fences around the fields. They ploughed the land and sowed corn and wheat. When the soil became impoverished and exhausted in one place, the migrants would move further west, to explore new lands and raise a new crop. It was, however, only after the 1860s that settlers swept into the Great Plains across the River Mississippi.

THE WHEAT FARMERS
(i) From the late nineteenth century there was a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA. The rising urban population, export market was becoming ever bigger and rise in what prices, encouraged farmers to produce wheat. The spread of the railways made it easy to transport the grain from the wheat growing regions to the eastern coast for export. By the twentieth century the demand became even higher, and during the First

World War the world market boomed.
(ii) In 1910, about 45 million acres of land in the USA was under wheat. Nine years later, the area had expanded to 74 million acres, an increase of about 65 per cent. In many cases, big farmers – the wheat barons – controlled as much as 2,000 to 3,000 acres of land individually.

THE COMING OF NEW TECNNOLOGY
(i) This dramatic expansion was made possible by new technology. Through the nineteenth century, as the settlers moved into new habitats and lands, they modified their implements to meet their requirements.
(ii) The prairie was covered with a thick mat of grass with tough roots. To break th sod and turn the soil over, a variety of new ploughs were devised locally. By early twentieth century, farmers in the Great Plains were breaking the ground with tractors and disk ploughs, clearing vast stretches for wheat cultivation.
In 1831, Cyrus McCormick invented the first mechanical reaper. By the early twentieth century, most farmers were using combined harvesters to cut grain. With one of these machines, 5oo acres of wheat could be harvested in two weeks.
(iii) For the big farmers of the Great Plains these machines had many attractions. The price of wheat was high and the demand seemed limitless.
(v) With power driven machinery, four men could plough, seed and harvest 2,000 to 4,000 acres of wheat in a season.

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE POOR?
For the poorer farmers, machines brought misery. They borrowed money on loan to buy machines but found it difficult to pay back their debts. Many of them deserted their farmers and looked for jobs elsewhere. Mechanization reduced the need for labour. After 1920’s most farmers traced troubles. Production had expanded so rapidly during the war and post-war years that there was a large surplus. Unsold stocks piled up, storehouses overflowed with grain, and vast amounts of corn and wheat were turned into animal feed. Wheat prices fell and export markets collapsed. This created the grounds for the Great Agrarian Depressions of the 1930s that ruined wheat farmers everywhere.

DUST BOWL
In the 1930s, terrifying dust storms began to blow over the southern plains. Black blizzards rolled in, very often 7,000 to 8,000 feet high, rising like monstrous waves of muddy water. As the skies darkened, and the dust swept in, people were blinded and choked. Cattle were suffocated to death; their lungs caked whit dust and mud. Sand buried fences, covered fields, and coated the surfaces of rivers till the fish died. Dead bodies of birds and animals were strewing all over the landscape. Tractors and machines that had ploughed the earth and harvested the wheat in the 1920s were now clogged with dust, damaged beyond repair. They came because the early 1930s were years of persistent drought. Ordinary dust storms became black blizzards only because the entire landscape had been ploughed over, stripped of all grass that held it together. When wheat cultivation had expanded dramatically in the early twentieth century, zealous farmers had recklessly uprooted all vegetation, and tractors had expanded dramatically in the early twenties century, zealous farmers had recklessly uprooted all vegetation, and tractors had turned the soil over, and broken the sod into dust. The whole region had become a dust bowl.

THE INDIAN FARMER AND OPIUM PRODUCTION
Over the period of colonial rule, the rural landscape was radically transformed. As cultivation expanded, the area under frosts and pastures declined. In the colonial period, rural India also came to produce a range of crops for the world market. In the early nineteenth century, indigo and opium were two of the major commercial crops. By the end of the century, peasants were producing sugarcane, cotton, jute, wheat and several other crops for export.

A TASTE FOR TEA: THE TRADE WITH CHINA
(i) In the eighteenth century, the English East India Company was buying tea and silk from China for sale in
England .As tea became a popular English drink, the trade became more and more important in fact the profits of the East India Company came to depend on the tea trade.
(ii) England at this time produces nothing that could be easily sold in China. In such a situation, how could
Western merchants finance the tea trade? They could buy tea only by paying in silver coins or bullion. This meant an outflow of treasure from England, a prospect that created widespread anxiety. Merchants therefore looked for ways to stop this loss of sliver. They searched for a commodity they could sell in China, something they could persuade the Chinese t6o buy. Opium was such a commodity.
(iii) The Chinese were aware of the dangers of opium addiction, and the Emperor had forbidden its production and sale except for medicinal purposes. But Western merchants in the mid-eighteenth century began an illegal trade in opium.
(iv) While the English cultivated a taste for Chinese tea, the Chinese became addicted to opium. People of all classes took to the drug-shopkeepers and peddlers, officials and army men, aristocrats and paupers:
As China became a country of opium addicts, British trade in tea flourished. The returns from opium sale financed the tea purchases in China.

THE OPIUM CAM FROM
When the British conquered Bengal, they, made a determined effort to produces opium in the lands under their control. Before 1767, no more then 500 chests were being exported from India. A hundred years later, in 1870, the government was exporting about 50,000 chests annually.

FARMERS WERE UNWILLING TO TURN THEIR FIELDS OVER T POPPY
First the crop had to be grown on the best land, on fields that near villages and well matured. Second, many cultivators owned no land. To cultivate, they had to pay rent and lease land landlords. Third, the cultivation of opium was a difficult process. Finally, the price the government paid to the cultivators for the opium they produced was very low.

UNWILLING WATERS WERE MADE OP PRODUCE OPIUM
(i) In the rural areas of Bengal and Bihar, there were large numbers of poor peasants. From the 1780s such peasants found their village headmen (mabato) giving them money advances to produce opium.
(ii) By taking the loan, the cultivator was forced to grow opium on a specified area of land hand over the produce to the agents once the crop had been harvested.

(iii) The problem could have been partly solved by increasing the price of opium. The prices given to the peasants were so low that by the early eighteenth century angry peasants began agitating for higher prices and refused to take advances.

Labels:

History Solution Class 9 Chapter 6 Peasants and Farmers

6. Peasants and Farmers
Syllabus
a) Histories of the emergence of different forms of farming and peasant societies.
b) Changes within rural economies in the modern world.
Case studies: Focus on contrasting forms of rural change and different forms of rural societies (expansion of large-scale wheat and cotton farming in USA, rural economy and the Agricultural Revolution in England and small production in colonial India.)
Facts that Matter:
1)      Agricultural revolution first took place in England. Over the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the English country side changed dramatically. Before this time in large parts of England the country side was open. It was not partitioned into enclosed lands privately owned by landlords. Peasants cultivated on strips of land around the village they lived in. beyond these strips of cultivation lay the common land. All villagers had access to the commons. Here, they pastured their cows and grazed their sheep, collected fuel wood for fire and berries and fruits for food.
2)      This economy of open fields and common lands changed drastically over time. In 16th century, rich farmers divided and enclosed them in order to make available good feed for their sheep. They also built hedges around their holdings to separate their property from that of others. They drove out villagers who had small cottages on the commons, and they prevented the poor from entering the enclosed fields.
3)      The enclosure Movement proceeded slowly till the middle of the 18th century. After the mid-18th century, it swept through the country side, changing the English landscape forever. More and more lands began to be enclosed.
4)      The 16th century enclosures promoted sheep farming whereas the enclosures occurred in the late 18th century was for grain production. From the mid 18th century, the English population expanded rapidly. This meant an increased demand for food grains to feed the population.
5)      By the end of the 18th century, France was at war with England. This disrupted trade and the import of food grains from Europe. Prices of food grains in England rose high, encouraging landowners to enclose lands for grain production.
6)      Landlords got benefitted by enclosures but the poor became helpless because they depended on the commons for their survival. Now they could no longer collect their firewood from the forests or graze their cattle on the commons. Everything belonged to the landlords; everything had a price which the poor could not afford to pay.
7)      In places where enclosures happened on an extensive scale, the poor were displaced from the land. They found their customary rights gradually disappearing. They went to cities to find jobs.
8)      The introduction of threshing machines also created problems for the poor. The Captain Swing riots spread in the country side to discourage their use.
9)      Thus, the coming of modern agriculture in England meant many different changes. On one hand, the richer farmers made 6 profits by expanding grain productions. On the other hand, the poor farmers faced hardships due to disappearance of open fields.
10)  So far the USA is concerned, modern agriculture developed there by the early twentieth century.
11)  The story of agrarian expansion is closely connected to the Westward movement of the white settlers who displaced local tribes by taking over their land. They slashed and burnt forests, pulled out the stumps, cleared the land for cultivation and built log cabins in the forest clearings. Then they cleared larger areas, ploughed them and sowed corn and wheat.
12)  In the early years, the fertile soil produced good crops. When the soil exhausted in one place, the migrants would move further to explore new land. It was, however, only after the 1860s that settlers swept into the great plains across the river Mississippi. In subsequent decades this region became a major wheat producing area of America.
13)  From the late 19th century, there was a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA. In 1910, about 45 million acres of land in the USA was under wheat. Nine years later, the area had expanded to 74 million acres.
14)  This dramatic expansion was made possible by new technology such as mechanical reapers, tractors, disk ploughs, etc. the new machines allowed big farmers to rapidly clear large tracts, break up soil, remove the grass and prepare the ground for cultivation. The work could be done quickly and with a minimal number of hands.
15)  But poor farmers faced hardships. Mechanisation had reduced the need for labour. As a result, many of them looked for jobs elsewhere.
16)  The expansion of wheat agriculture in the Great Plains created big problems. In the 1930s, terrifying dust storms began to blow over the southern plains. As the skies darkened and the dust swept in people were blinded and chocked. Cattle were suffocated to death. Tractors and machines that had ploughed the earth and harvested the wheat in the 1920s were now clogged with dust, damaged beyond repair.
17)  The whole region thus became a dust bowl. The American dream of a land of plenty turned into a nightmare. This incident taught the settlers a lesson that they should respect the ecological conditions of each region. They should not uproot all vegetation to fulfil their greed.
18)  The history of opium production in India was linked up with the story of British trade with China. In the late 18th century, the English East India Company was buying tea and silk from China for sale in England. As tea became a popular English beverage, the tea trade became more important.
19)  This created a problem. England at this time produced nothing that could be easily sold in China. In such a situation the western merchants could not finance the tea trade. They could buy tea only by paying in silver coins or bullion. This meant an outflow of treasure from England. Finally they searched for a commodity they could sell in China. Opium was such a commodity.
20)  In the beginning the Chinese kept themselves away from opium because they knew the dangers of opium addiction. But soon people of all classes in China began to take the drug. Now supplies had to be increased which was a little bit difficult job.
21)  The Indian farmers were not willing to grow opium. But when they were given the facility of advances for the peasants of Bengal and Bihar. This was done to make them willing to produce opium for the colonial state.
22)  By 1773, the British government in Bengal had established a monopoly to trade in opium. No one was legally permitted to trade in the product.

Words that Matter:
·         Bushel: A measure of capacity.
·         Shillings: An English currency.
·         Sod: Pieces of earth with grass.
·         A walking plough: A device used for breaking the sod and turning the soil over.
·         Scythe: A device used for moving grass before the mid-19th century.
·         Mound: A measure of weight. 1 mound=40 seers. 1 seer is a little under a kg.
·         Mahato: Village headman.
·         Pykars: Travelling traders.

Dateline:
·         1773: The British government in Bengal had established a monopoly to trade in opium.
·         28 August, 1830: A threshing machine of a farmer was destroyed by labourers in East Kent.
·         1 June, 1830: A farmer in the north-west of England found his barn reduced to ashes by a fire that started at night.
·         1800-1850: The white Americans moved into the Mississippi valley.
·         1930s: Terrifying dust storm occurred in southern plains.


NCERT In Text Questions Solved
1. What happened to the women and children? Cow keeping, collection of fire wood, gleaning, gathering of fruits and berries from the common lands was earlier mostly done by women and children.
Can you suggest how enclosure must affect the lives of women and children? Can you imagine how the disappearance of common lands might have changed the relationship between men, women and children within the family?
They became jobless. Their life became difficult. The lives of women and children must have been badly affected due to enclosures. They would have been displaced from the land. Their customary rights would have been snatched. Deprived of their rights and driven off the land, they would have been tramped in search of work.

2. Draw a timeline from 1650 to 1930 showing the significant agricultural changes which you have read about in this chapter.
Timeline
Agricultural Changes
1660
Farmers in many parts of England began growing turnip and clover.
1750
More and more food grains were grown.
1831
Cyrus McCormick invented the first mechanical reaper which could cut in one day as much as five men could cut with cradles and 16 men with sickles.
1870
Great plains across the River Mississippi became a major wheat-producing area of America.
1930s
Terrifying dust storms began to blow over the southern plains.

1. Explain briefly the open field system meant to rural people in 18th century England. Look at the system from the point of view of:
i) A rich farmer:
The open field system provided an opportunity to the rich farmers to enclose the best pastures for their own cattle. In the 16th century, the price of wool went up in the world market. Hence, rich farmers planned to expand wool production by improving their sheep breeds and ensuring good feed for them. Soon they started controlling large areas of land in compact blocks to allow improved breeding. They enclosed common land and built hedges around their holdings to separate their property from that of others. They drove out villagers from the commons. They also prevented them from entering the enclosed field.
ii) A labourer: For labourers, open fields were essential for their survival. Here they pastured their cows and grazed their sheep, collected fuel wood foe fire and berries and fruit for food. They fished in the rivers and ponds and hunted rabbit in common forests. It supplemented their meagre income, sustained their cattle and helped them tide over bad times when crops fields.
iii) A peasant woman: Peasant women used the open fields for grazing their cattle, gathering fruit and fuel wood.

3. Explain briefly the factors which led to the enclosures in England.
The factors which led to the enclosures in England are given below.
i) In the 16th century, the price of wool went up in the world market. This encouraged the rich farmers to expand wool production to earn profits. For this, they began to enclose common land where they could easily improve their sheep breeds and ensure good feed for them.
ii) From the mid 18th century, the population of England expanded rapidly. This meant an increased demand for food grains to feed the growing population. This encouraged landowners to enclose lands and enlarge the area under grain cultivation.
iii) By the end of the 18th century, France was at war with England. This disrupted trade and the import of food grains from Europe. Prices of food grains in England soared high, encouraging landowners to enclose lands for grains cultivation.
iv) The growing industrialisation and urbanisation of England too became a factor for enclosing more and more open lands.
v) Enclosures were essential to make long term investments on land and plan crop rotations to improve the soil.

4. Why were threshing machines opposed by the poor in England?
Threshing machines were opposed by the poor in England due to the followings reasons:
i) The introduction of threshing machines encouraged land owners to reduce their dependence on labourers. Now land owners tried to cut wages and the number of workmen they employed. This aggravated the miseries of the poor.
ii) Unemployment spread among the poor. They tramped from village to village and those with uncertain jobs lived in fear of a loss of their livelihood.
iii) For the poor the threshing machines had become a sign of bad times.

5. Who was Captain Swing? What did the name symbolise or represent?
Captain Swing was a mythic name used in threatening letters written to English landlords against the use of threshing machines and their reluctance to employ labourers.
The name of Captain Swing spread panic among the landowners. Many of them destroyed their threshing machines fearing attacks by armed bands at nights.

6. What was the impact of the westward expansion of settlers in the USA?
i) The white settlers got settled on the Appalachian plateau by driving away the American Indians. Then they moved into the Mississippi valley between 1820 and 1850. They slashed and burnt forests, pulled out the stumps, cleared the land for cultivations and built log cabins in the forest clearings. Then they cleared large areas and erected fences around the fields. They ploughed the land and sowed corn and wheat and harvested good crops.
ii) After 1860s, the white settlers swept into the great plains across the river Mississippi. In subsequent decades this region became a major wheat producing area of America.
iii) From the late 19th century, there was a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA. The urban population in the USA was growing and the export market was becoming even bigger. As the demand increased, wheat prices rose, encouraging farmers to produce more and more wheat. During the First World War the world market boomed. Russian suppliers of wheat were cut off and the USA had to feed Europe. US president Wilson called upon farmers to respond to the need of the hour.
iv) The westward expansion of the white settlers paved the way for the development of new technologies which made the process of cultivation very effective and time saving.
v) By the early 20th century, farmers in the Great Plains were breaking the ground with the help of the new technologies like traders and disc ploughs, clearing vast stretches for wheat production.
vi) The USA began to dominate the world market in agricultural produce and came to be known as the ‘bread basket of the world’.

7. What were the advantages and disadvantages of the use of mechanical harvesting machines in the USA?
Advantages: Various mechanical harvesting machines were proved to be a boon for the USA. It was the time when the prices of wheat were high and the demand seemed limitless. The new machines allowed big farmers to rapidly clear large tracts, break up the soil, remove the grass and prepare the ground for cultivation. With the help of these machines the work could be done quickly plough, seed and harvest 2000 to 4000 across of wheat in a season.
Disadvantages: These machines were proved to be a bane for the poor farmers because they brought misery in their life. Many of them brought these machines, imagining that wheat pieces would remain high and profits would flow in. if they had no money, the banks offered loans. Those who borrowed found it difficult to pay back their debts. Many of them deserted their farms and looked for jobs elsewhere.
But jobs were difficult to find. Mechanisation had reduced the need for labour. And the boom of the late 19th and early 20th centuries seemed to have come to an end by the mid 1920s. after that most farmers faced trouble. Production had expanded so rapidly during the war and past war years that there was a large surplus which were turned into animal feed. Wheat prices fell and export markets collapsed. This became the cause of the Great Agrarian Depression of the 1930s.

8. What lessons can we draw from the conversion of the countryside in the USA from a bread basket to a dust bowl?
The expansion of wheat agriculture in the Great Plains created grave problems. In the 1930s, terrifying dust storms began to blow over the southern plains. Black blizzards rolled in, very often 7000 to 8000 feet high, rising like monstrous waves of muddy water. This happened because the entire landscape had been ploughed over, stripped of all grass that held it together. When wheat cultivation had expanded dramatically in the early 20th century, zealous farmers had recklessly uprooted all vegetation, and tractors had turned the soil over and broken the soil into dust. The whole region had become a dust bowl.
We can draw the following lessons from this incident:
i) We must respect the ecological conditions of each region.
ii) We should control our desire to win over the nature. Such a desire can never be fulfilled. But it course of our frantic effort to fulfil such a desire, we can play havoc with the nature by creating ecological imbalance.
iii) Whatever development we want to bring must be eco-friendly.
iv) We must not forget that by misbalancing ecological conditions we endanger our own life.

9. Write a paragraph on why the British insisted on farmers growing opium in India.
The British insisted on farmers growing opium in India in order to balance their trade with China from where they bought tea and silk for sale in England. The British could buy tea only by paying in silver coins or bullion. This meant an outflow of treasure from England. This created widespread anxiety among the British who believed that a loss of treasure would impoverish the nation and deplete its wealth. Merchants therefore looked for ways to stop this loss of silver. Opium was the only commodity which the British could sell in China and persuade the Chinese to buy. Hence, it became essential to grow more and more opium in India. They persuaded Indian farmers to grow opium which they took from India to China and tea from China to England.

10. Why were Indian reluctant to grow opium?
There were several reasons behind it:
i) The crop had to be grown on the best land, on fields that lay near villages and were well manure. On this land peasants usually produced pulses. If they planted opium on this land, then pulses could not be grown there, or they would have to be grown on inferior land where harvests were poorer and uncertain.
ii) There were many cultivators who had no land of their own. To cultivate, they had to pay rent and lease land from landlords. And the rent charged on good lands near villages was very high.
iii) The cultivation of opium was a difficult process. The plant was delicate, and cultivators had to spend long hours nurturing it. This meant that they did not have enough time to care for other crops.
iv) The price the government paid to the cultivators for the opium they produced was very low.

More Questions Solved
I. Multiple Choice Questions:
Choose the correct option:
1. Which one of the following is the appropriate reason that excited swing rioters to destroy threshing machines during 1930s in England?
a) They broke these machines in the name of Captain Swing.
b) These machines deprived workmen of their livelihood.
c) Captain Swing was a person who broke all these machines.
d) They were threatening landlords.
2. Why was common land essential for survival of the poor in England?
a) Common land supplemented income of the poor and helped them during bad times.
b) Poor could move freely in common land.
c) Poor could set up industry land.
d) All the above.
3. Who was the American leader under whom maximum expansion of wheat cultivation took place?
a) President Wilson               b) President Lincoln
c) President Bush                    d) President Clinton
4. When did the white Americans move into the Mississippi Valley?
a) Between 1750 and 1850     b) Between 1830 to 1832
c) Between 1820 and 1850    d) Between 1771 to 1850
5. What item/items did the British merchants import from China?
a) Silk              b) Tea              c) Both (a) and (b)       d) None
6. Which country became the bread basket of the world?
a) America      b) China           c) Japan           d) India
7. By 1773, the British government in Bengal had established a monopoly to trade in……………
a) indigo          b) opium         c) tea               d) cotton
8. Why did East India Company start triangular trade between India-China-Britain?
a) To take balance of trade in favour of the Company.
b) To get maximum profits.
c) To attain favour from China.
d) To get profit from India.
9. Why were the Manchus not willing to allow entry of foreign goods in China?
a) They did not need foreign goods.
b) They had no money to buy foreign goods.
c) They feared that the merchants would middle in local polity and disrupt their authority.
d) None of the above.
10. Why were peasants in the 19th century unwilling to cultivate opium in India?
a) The price paid by government was very low.
b) The plant was delicate.
c) The cultivators were poor.
d) All of the above.
11. Which one of the following was the main reason for unfavourable balance of trade between China and East India Company during the 19th century?
a) East India Company bought tea in return of silver coins.
b) China did not allow any foreign product in place of it.
c) East India Company forced to sell tea in loss.
d) China favoured the Company.
12. When did Cyrus McCormick invent the first mechanical reaper?
a) In 1811        b) In 1831       c) In 1801        d) In 1809
13. What was done in different countries of England during the Captain Swing movement?
a) Threshing machines were broken
b) Rich farmers were compelled to help poor farmers
c) Landowners were looted
d) Agriculture was expanded
14. What was the scythe used for before the mid-19th century?
a) For sowing seeds                b) For harvesting crop
c) For cutting grass                d) For cutting vegetables
15. Opium was known primarily for its……..
a) medicinal properties                     b) deadly effect on its users
c) refreshing effect on its users          d) excellent taste
16. The English population began to expand rapidly from………
a) the nineteenth century                   b) the mid-eighteenth century
c) the early eighteenth century          d) the eighteenth century

II. Very Short Answer Type Questions:
1. Give one reason that excited swing rioters to destroy the threshing machines during 1930s in England?
These machines deprived workmen of their livelihood.
2. Why was common land essential for the survival of the poor in England?
Common land supplemented income of the poor and helped them during bad times.
3. Who was the American leader under whose period maximum expansion of wheat cultivation took place?
Maximum expansion of wheat cultivation took place under President Wilson.
4. Which two items did the British merchants import from China?
The British merchants imported would meddle in local polity and disrupt their authority.
5. Why did the East India Company start triangular trade between India-China-Britain?
The East Indian Company started triangular trade between India-China-Britain to take balance of trade in favour of the company.
6. Why were the Manchus not Willing to allow entry of foreign goods in China?
They feared that the merchants would meddle in local polity and disrupt their authority.
7. Why were the Indian peasants in the nineteenth century unwilling to grow opium? Give two reasons.
i) The cultivation of opium was a difficult process.
ii) The price the government paid to the cultivators for the opium they produced was very low.
8. What was the main reason for unfavourable balance of trade between China and East India company during the nineteenth century?
The East India Company bought tea from China only by paying in silver coins or billion. This meant an overflow of treasure from England, a prospect that created widespread anxiety.
9. What was done in different countries of England during the Captain Swing movement?
Threshing machines were broken on a large scale.
10. What was the scythe used for before the mid-nineteenth century?
Before the mid-nineteenth century the scythe was used for cutting grass.
11. Who created the early enclosures?
Individual landlords created the early enclosures.
12. How were the sixteenth century enclosures different from the late eighteenth century enclosures? Give one point.
The sixteenth century enclosures promoted sheep farming whereas the late eighteenth century enclosures promoted grain production.
13. When did the English population expand rapidly?
From the mid-eighteenth century, the English population expanded rapidly. Between 1750 and 1900, it multiplied over four times, mounting from 7 million in 1750 to 21million in 1850 and 30 million in 1900.
14. How was increase in food grain production made possible in England in the late eighteenth century?
It was made possible by bringing new lands under cultivation.
15. What promoted farmers in England to grow turnips and clover?
When farmers came to know that planting of turnip and clover improved the soil and made it more fertile. They began to grow these crops. Turnip was also a good fodder crop relished by cattle.
16. How   did land enclosures affect the life of the landlords and the poor?
Land enclosures made the landlords prosperous. But at the same time the poor became poorer. For a very large part of the year they had no work.
17. How did the poor view the threshing machines?
They viewed the threshing machines as a sign of bad times. They became poorer because employment was not certain now.
18. From the late nineteenth century, there was a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA. Give two reasons.
i) The urban population in the USA was growing as a result of which demand of wheat increased.
ii) The export market was becoming ever bigger.
19. Who said, “Plant more wheat, wheat will win the war”?
US President Wilson said it.
20. How did Cyrus McCormick’s mechanical reaper prove to be a boon for the farmers in the USA?
This mechanical reaper could cut in one day as much as five men could cut with cradles and 16 men with sickles.
21. What was opium known primarily for?
Opium was known primarily for its medicinal properties and used in minuscule quantities for certain types of medicines.
22. What was the triangular trade?
The triangular trade took place between India, China and Britain. The British traders took opium from India to China and Tea from China to England. Between India and England trade flowed both ways.

III. Short Answer Type Questions:
1. The enclosure movement proceeded slowly till the middle of the 18th century. Why? What happened after that?
i) The early enclosures were usually created by individual landlords. They were not supported by the state or the church.
ii) After the mid-18th century, the enclosure movement swept through the countryside, changing the English landscape forever. Between 1750 and 1850, 6 million acres of land was enclosed.
iii) The British Parliament no longer watched this process from a distance. It passed 4000 Acts legalising these enclosures.

2. Why was the land being enclosure in the late eighteenth century England?
i) In the late-eighteenth century England the land was being enclosed for grain production. These enclosures became a sign of a changing time. From the mid 18th century, English population expanded rapidly. Between 1750 and 1900, it multiplied over for times, mounting from 7 million in 1750 to 21 million in 1850 and 30 million in 1900.
ii) This meant an increased demand for food grains to feed the population. Moreover, Britain at this time was industrialising. More and more people began to live and work in urban areas. Men from ruler areas migrated to towns in search of jobs.
iii) To survive they had to buy food grains in the market. As the urban population grew, the market for food grains expanded and when demand increased rapidly, food grains prices rose. This encouraged land owners to enclose lands and enlarge the area under grain cultivation.

3. How were the poor affected by enclosures?
i) Enclosures made the life of the poor miserable. When fences came up, the enclosed land became the exclusive property of one land owner. The poor could no longer collect their firewood from the forests, or graze their cattle on the commons.
ii) They could no longer collect apples and berries, or hunt small animals for meat. Nor could they gather the stalks that lay on the fields after the crops were cut.
iii) Everything belonged to the landlords, everything had a price which the poor could not afford to pay. In places where enclosures happened on an extensive scale, the poor were displaced from the land.
iv) Deprived of their customary rights and driven off the land, they tramped in search of work.
4. What were the factors that contributed to the expansion of wheat production in the USA from the late 19th century?
Several factors contributed to the expansion of wheat production in the USA:
i) The urban population in the USA was growing and the export market was becoming ever bigger.
ii) As the demand increased, wheat prices rose, encouraging farmers to produce wheat. The spread of the railways made it easy to transport the grain from the wheat growing regions to the eastern coast for export.
iii) By the early 20th century the demand became even higher and during the First World War the world market boomed. Russian supplies of wheat were cut off and the USA had to feed Europe. US President Wilson called upon farmers to respond to the need of the time. Hence, farmers began to grow more and more wheat.

5. How did mechanisation of agriculture affect the lives of the poor farmers in the USA?
Or
Machines brought untold miseries for the poor. Explain.
i) Many of the farmers bought machines, imagining that wheat prices would remain high and profits would flow in. if they had no money, the banks offered loans. Those who borrowed found in difficult to pay back their debts. Many of them deserted their farms and looked for jobs elsewhere.
ii) But it was not easy to find jobs. Mechanisation had reduced the need for labour and the boom of the late 1920s. After that, most farmers faced trouble. Production had expanded so rapidly during the war and post war years that there was a large surplus.
iii) Unsold stocks piled up, storehouses overflowed with grain and vast amounts of corn and wheat were turned into animal feed. Wheat prices fell and export markets collapsed. This created the grounds for the Great Agrarian Depression of the 1930s that ruined wheat farmers everywhere.

6. What happened when the entire region of the Great Plains became a dust bowl?
Or
What were the consequences of expansion of wheat cultivation in the Great Plains?
i) Terrifying dust storms began to blow over the southern plains of America. Black blizzards rolled in, very often 7000 to 8000 feet high, raising the monstrous waves of muddy water.
ii) They came day after day, year after year, through the 1930s. as the skies darkened and the dust swept in, people were blinded and choked. Cattle were suffocated to death, their lungs choked with dust and mud.
iii) Sand buried fences, covered fields and coated the surfaces of rivers till the fish died. Dead bodies of birds and animals were scattered all over the landscape.
iv) Tractors and machines that had ploughed the earth and harvested the wheat in the 1920s were now clogged with dust, damaged beyond repair.

7. What was opium primarily known for? How were the Chinese made addicted to it?
Opium was primarily known for its medicinal properties and used in miniscule quantities for certain types of medicines. The Chinese were well aware of the dangers of its addiction and the Emperor had therefore forbidden its production and sale except for medicinal purposes. But western merchants in the mid-18th century began an illegal trade in opium. It was unloaded in a number of sea ports of south eastern China and carried by local agents to the interiors. By the early 1820s, about 1000 crates were being annually smuggled into China. Fifteen years later, over 35000 crates were being unloaded every year. This meant that the Chinese became addicted to opium. People of all classes took to the drug-shopkeepers and peddlers, officials and army men, aristocrats and paupers. In 1839, it was estimated that 4 million Chinese had become opium smokers. Thus, China became a country of opium addicts.

8. How did the British government persuade the unwilling cultivators to grow opium?
Or
How were the unwilling cultivators made to produce opium?
i) Indian cultivators were not ready to grow opium because it was an unprofitable business for them. Seeing their unwillingness, the British government started a system of advances.
ii) In the normal areas of Bengal and Bihar, there were large numbers of poor peasants. They never had enough to survive. From the 1780s, such peasants found their village headmen giving them money advances to grow opium.
iii) The innocent peasants did not understand that it was the government opium agents who were advancing the money to the headmen, who in turn gave to them.
iv) When offered a loan, the cultivators were tempted to accept, hoping to meet their immediate needs and pay back the loan at a later stage. Thus, it was the system of advances that made the unwilling cultivators grows opium.

9. How did the system of advances tie the peasants to the British government?
Or
‘After accepting money advances the cultivators had no option but to grow opium.’ Explain.
i) When the British government started the system of advances, many cultivators became ready to grow opium. They though that they would fulfil their immediate needs with the loan and would pay back it at a later stage.
ii) But the loan tied the peasants to the government. By taking the loan, they were forced to grow opium on a specified area of land and hand over the produce to the agents once crop had been harvested.
iii) They had no option of planting the field with a crop of his choice or of selling their produce to anyone but the government agent. And they were bound to accept the low price offered for the produce.

10. What is meant by ‘Triangular Trade’? What led to its development?
The triangular trade refers to the trade between England, India and China in the eighteenth century.
i) The English East India Company was buying tea and silk from China for sale in England. As tea became a popular English drink, the tea trade became more and more important.
ii) England at this time produced nothing that could be easily sold in China. The western merchants did not have a way to finance the tea trade.
They could buy tea only by paying in silver coins or billion. This meant an outflow of treasure from England.
At last it was decided that opium would be grown in India and transported to China in exchange of tea.

11. How did the westward expansion of settlers in the USA lead to a total destruction of American Indians?
i) In 1800, Thomas Jefferson became President of the USA. The American War of Independence had been fought from 1775 to 1783 and the formation of the United States of America made it seem like a land of promise from the East Coast.
ii) It was during this time that the 700,000 white settlers began to move westward on to the Appalachian plateau through the passes. The westward expansion of settlers in the USA led to a complete total destruction of American Indians who were pushed westwards, down the Mississippi river, and then further west.
iii) They fought back, but were defeated. Numerous wars were waged in which Indians were massacred. Their villages were burnt and cattle destroyed.

12. What led to a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA?
i) From the late nineteenth century, there was a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA and the export market became bigger.
ii) During the First World War, the world market boomed. Russian supplies of wheat were cut off and the USA had to feed Europe.
iii) US President Wilson encouraged American farmers to plant more wheat. In 1910, about 45 million acres of land in the USA was under wheat and nine years later it expanded to 74 million acres, an increase of about 65 per cent.

13. When did the British government in Bengal establish a monopoly to trade in opium? How did people react to it and what steps were taken by the British government to control it?
i) By 1773, the British government in Bengal established a monopoly to trade in opium. No one else was legally permitted to trade in the product.
ii) The government wanted to produce opium at a cheap rate and sell it at a high price to opium agents in Calcutta, who then shipped it to China. But the prices given to the peasants were so low that by the early eighteenth century angry peasants began agitating for higher prices and refused to take advances. In regions around Banaras, cultivators began giving up opium cultivation.
iii) To control the situation the British instructed its agents posted in the princely states to take away all opium and destroy the crops. This conflict between the British government, peasants and local traders continued as long as opium production lasted.

14. Why did the whole region of the Great Plains become a dust bowl?
i) When wheat cultivation had expanded dramatically in the early 19th century, zealous farmers had recklessly uprooted all vegetation and tractors had turned the soil over and broken the soil into dust.
ii) The whole region had become a dust bowl. In the 1930s, terrifying dust storms began to blow over the southern plains of America.
iii) Black blizzard rolled in, very often 7000 to 8000 feet high, rising like monstrous waves of muddy water. The American dream of a plenty had turned into a nightmare.

IV. Long Answer Type Questions:
1. The coming of new technology proved to be a boon for the expansion of wheat cultivation in the USA. Explain.
Or
What role did the new technology play in the expansion of wheat cultivation in USA?
i) The expansion of wheat cultivation in the USA was made possible by new technology. Through the 19th century, as the white settlers moved into new habitats and new lands, they modified their implements to meet their requirements.
ii) When they entered the mid-western prairie, the simple ploughs the farmers had used in the eastern coastal areas of the USA proved ineffective. The prairie was covered with thick mat of grass with tough roots. To break the sod and turn the soil over, a variety of new plough were devised locally.
iii) By the early 20th century, farmers in the Great Plains were breaking the ground with tractors and disk ploughs, clearing vast stretches for wheat cultivation.
iv) Before the 1830s, the grain used to be harvested with a cradle or sickle. At harvest time, hundreds of men and women could be seen cutting the crop. In 1831, Cyrus McCormick invented the first mechanical reaper which could cut in one day as much as five men could cut with cradles and 16 men with sickles.
v) By the early 20th century, most farmers were using combined harvesters to cut grain. With one of these machines, 500 acres of wheat could be harvested in two weeks.
vi) Thus, the new machines enabled the farmers to rapidly clear large tracts, break up the soil, remove the grass and prepare the ground for cultivation. With power-driven machinery, four men could plough, seed and harvest 2000 to 4000 acres of wheat in a season.

2. How did the USA become the bread basket of the world? How did it turn into a dust bowl?
Or
The American dream of a land of plenty had pushed into a nightmare. Explain.
i) The USA became the bread basket of the world by developing modern agriculture. After the United States of America, the white Americans began to move westward.
ii) By the time Thomas Jefferson became President of the USA in 1800, over 700,000 white settlers had moved on to Appalachian plateau through the passes. Seen from the east coast, America seemed to be a land of promise.
iii) By the first decade of the 18th century, they settled on the Appalachian plateau and then moved into the Mississippi valley between 1820 and 1850. They made the land for cultivation and sowed corn and wheat.
iv) In the early years, the fertile soil produced good crops. When the soil became impoverished in one place, the migrants would move further west to raise new crop.
v) It was however, only after the 1860s that settlers swept into the Great Plains across the River Mississippi. In subsequent decades the region became a major wheat producing area of America.
vi) From the late 19th century, there was a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA. The urban population in the USA was growing and the export market was becoming ever bigger.
vii) As the demand increased, wheat prices rose, encouraging farmers to grow more and more wheat.
viii) In 1910, about 45 million acre of land in the USA was under wheat. Nine years later the area had expanded to 74 million acres. Now, the USA began to be called the ‘bread basket of the world’.
ix) But it could not maintain this image for a long period. The expansion of wheat production in the Great Plains created severe problems.
x) In the 1930s, terrifying dust storms began to blow over the Southern Plains. Black blizzards rolled in very often 7000 to 8000 feet high, rising like monstrous waves of muddy water.
xi) They came day after day, year after year, through the 1930s. As the skies darkened and the dust swept in, people were blinded and chocked.
xii) Cattle were suffocated to death, their lungs chocked with dust and wind. Dead bodies of birds and animals were scattered all over the landscape.
xiii) Tractors and machines that had ploughed the earth and harvested the wheat in the 1920s were now clogged with dust, damaged beyond repair. The whole region had become a dust bowl. The American dream of a plenty had turned into a nightmare.

3. Write an account on dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA and what were the results of expansion of wheat agriculture in the Great Plains?
From the late nineteenth century, there was a dramatic expansion of wheat production in the USA and the export market became bigger. During the First World War the world market boomed. Russian supplies of wheat were cut off and the USA had to feed Europe. US President Wilson encouraged American farmers to plant more wheat. In 1910, about 45 million acres of land in the USA was under wheat and nine years later it expanded to 74 million acres, an increase of about 65 per cent.
The expansion of wheat agriculture led to terrifying dust storms in the 1930s. terrifying dust storms began to blow over the southern plains of America. It came to be known as Black blizzards. The dust storms rose 7000 to 8000 feet high. They appeared as monstrous waves of muddy water. They came day after, year after year, through the 1930s.
As skies darkened and the dust swept in, people were blinded and choked. Cattle were suffocated to death, their lungs caked with dust and mud. Sand buried fences, covered field and coated the surfaces of river till the fish died. Dead bodies of birds and animals were scattered all over the landscape. Tractors and machines clogged with dust and damaged beyond repair.

4. Discuss the system of advances introduced by the colonial state. How did the system tie the poor farmers to the government?
in the rural areas of Bengal and Bihar, there were large numbers of poor peasants. It was difficult for them to pay rent to the landlord or to buy food and clothing. From 1780s, such peasants found their village headmen giving them money advances to produce opium. When offered a loan, the cultivators were tempted to accept, hoping to meet their immediate needs and pay back the loan at the stage.
i) When the British government started the system of advances, many cultivators became ready to grow opium. They though that they would fulfil their immediate needs with the loan and would pay back it at a later stage.
ii) But the loan tied the peasants to the government. By taking the loan, they were forced to grow opium on a specified area of land and hand over the produce to the agents once crop had been harvested.
iii) They had no option of planting the field with a crop of his choice or of selling their produce to anyone but the government agent. And they were bound to accept the low price offered for the produce.

5. What did the enclosure imply? Why was the land enclosed in the 18th century in England?
i) The land enclosure in England implied a big piece of land which was enclosed from all sides and there were hedges built around it to separate it from the lands of others.
ii) The land was enclosed to increase grain production for the rising English population which multiplied over four times between 1750 and 1900 mounting to 7 million in 1750 to 21 million in 1850 and 30 million in 1900. This increased the demand for food grains to feed the population.
iii) Due to industrialisation in Britain urban population grew. Men from rural areas migrated to towns in search of jobs. To survive they had to buy food grains in the market which expanded and eventually the food grain prices rose high.
iv) By the end of the 18th century, France was at war with England. This disrupted trade and import of food grains from Europe. Prices of food grains increased encouraging landowners to enclose lands. Enclosures were also important for long term investments on land and to plan crop rotations for maintaining soil fertility. Thus the Parliament passed the Enclosure Acts.





Labels: